Code / Appnel Solutions 

Posts from April 2008

Meet The WordPresses

For the past few weeks I’ve been monitoring the blogging questions on LinkedIn out of curiosity. In that time I’ve seen questions that asked for advice on TypePad vs. WordPress that received confused answers. Which WordPress was the asker referring to? There are significant differences.

WordPress.COM and TypePad is a fair comparison because they are both hosted blogging systems. WordPress.ORG is the open source software that you can download and install on your servers. With the source code you can modify it to your heart’s desire and use plugins etc. So if you are referring to WordPress.ORG then Movable Type is a more relevant then TypePad.

While this confusion is easily cleared it is still lost on most people. The WordPresses share the same name, but in many, but not all, respects are different things.

This could have been easily avoided if WordPress.COM would have been named something else. After all, TypePad began as a fork of the MT code and still shares some parts today. Given the popularity of Movable Type then (and still now), Ben and Mena could have chosen to name that service Movable Type. I’m thankful they didn’t.


Go, Blog It! Go!

Six Apart continues to break down the walls around social communities.

Yesterday Six Apart announced the availability of a Facebook application (yes you read that correctly) called Blog It. The TypePad-powered service enables Facebook users to make posts in Facebook out to any number of blogging tools.

Here are a couple of links covering it:

Six Apart CEO Chris Alden wrote up a good summary on his blog here.

Of course, there are those who are less than impressed or dismiss it as irrelevant, but then again Six Apart acknowledged there are shortcomings that they will be addressing. After all, this is a 1.0 release

I think it’s still pretty slick though.


Our Man Arvind

Keeping up to date on the latest MT community news and happenings is easier then ever.

Our man Arvind Satyanarayan has started authoring a weekly column for Blog Herald summarizing the weekly happenings in the MT community. His first two posts are already up:

New posts are to be published every Monday, hence “Movable Type Monday.”

Now if we could only get a feed dedicated to his posts.

BTW: When I say “our” I’m speaking as a member of the MT community. Arvind doesn’t work for Appnel Solutions.


Oh Wow! Persistent Storage for Amazon EC2 Announced

Amazon announces beta functionality that will address the biggest hassle for using EC2 servers for running web applications — a file system that won’t vanish if an instance stops running.

Chief Evangelist Jeff Barr explains the issue the Amazon Web Services Blog:

If you have taken a close look at Amazon EC2, you know that the instances are ephemeral. The instances have anywhere from 160 GB to 1.7 TB of attached storage. The storage is there as long as the instance is running, but of course it disappears as soon as the instance is shut down. Applications with a need for persistent storage could store data in Amazon S3 or in Amazon SimpleDB, but they couldn’t readily access either one as if it was an actual file system.

For my experience and those of others, instances expectedly shutting down has been rare so far, the possibility of catastrophic proportions was real. If an instance were to unexpected shut down it would be the equivalent of a traditional server’s drive array catching on fire — the data would be lost forever unless you had a very good backup system in place.

This shortcoming was acceptable in that EC2 was created for computing power and not general usage hosting, but that’s not what a lot of people wanted to do — many wanted to run web apps with SQL databases and other things.

So the ability to hosts sites or applications or run a SQL database server using EC2 instances was possible the onus has been on everyone using an instance to run file and database backups or even (multiple) replicated database servers even if high availability wasn’t a requirement so data wouldn’t be lost in the event of a failure.

Later Barr continues:

…our forthcoming persistent storage feature will give you the ability to create reliable, persistent storage volumes for use with EC2. Once created, these volumes will be part of your account and will have a lifetime independent of any particular EC2 instance.

In addition to being able to create and then mount these volumes of persistent storage from any EC2 instance, Amazon will be releasing functionality that will take snapshots (backups) of volumes and store it in your S3 account.

I also assume that you can mount these persistent storage volumes from multiple EC2 instances.

This is addition is simply huge because it makes Amazon a viable hosting option for web applications by eliminating the biggest technical hurdles. With this shift from compute to more general purpose server resources, I think a seismic shift is certain for how web applications are developed and deployed and Amazon is poised to win big.


← Before After →